
© 2008 2nd Pillar Projects
All images and text.
All rights reserved.
Why?
Everyone loves Britain’s countryside and everyone in Britain needs the food it produces. But managing the link between the countryside and food is complicated.
Little of Britain’s landscape is truly natural. The vast majority has been managed
by man for centuries and how people have chosen to use the countryside at a micro-
For some sixty years the dominant factor governing how British farmers managed their
bit of the planet was a national, political imperative to produce more food. A post-
Later, Britain’s entry to the European Community strengthened that drive and provided financial and other incentives to farmers to increase the intensity of production and to enlarge and modernise their farms.
This model of agriculture was not without cost.
Europe’s Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) was accused of degrading the natural environment
and landscape and of generating huge food surpluses that, when sold on international
markets, distorted trade and damaged the food and farming industries of other countries
-
In recent years, under a variety of influences, political and economic, Britain’s farming, and with it the countryside, has been changing. Agreements with Britain’s international trading partners, through the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the European Union (EU), have reduced the capacity to support farmers simply to produce more food.
Instead, they are being encouraged to become more commercially self-
This type of rural development, if undertaken in sustainable ways, UK Government and the EU can and does support.
The subsidising of agricultural production and intervention in markets for agricultural produce was the first pillar of the CAP. Sustainable rural development is the Second Pillar.




